Blog Archives

The Susan G. Komen for the Cure Foundation has decided to withdraw its funding from Planned Parenthood this week, claiming the threshold was the result of the new family planning policy prohibiting grants to organizations covered by the Technical studies and unbiased statistical analyzes show that orthodox cancer treatments such as radical surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy n Although journals are forced to make withdrawals of articles following this kind of fraud, see their reputation tarnished, they can always argue their good faith. But there is worse: when a scientific journal with peer has obviously not done his job. It is probably this yellow line that has just passed The Breast Journal. Owned by the American Wiley-Blackwell, which publishes some 1,500 scientific publications, this review focuses on research into breast disease (primarily cancer) and their treatments. December 30, 2011, The Breast Journal published on its website, in its section "Short Communications", a 4 page article signed by a Dutchman named Jerry Stüger, which wants an essay on sexual frustration in women as main cause (and unknown) breast cancer. The thesis is very original, which claims to "explain why, despite all available data on risk factors for breast cancer, 75% of women with breast cancer have no risk factors". The author does not bother to specify how it got this number and provides no experimental data. Moreover, none of the 15 references found at the end of the article relates to breast cancer! They all concern sexuality because therein lies the main idea of ​​Jerry Stüger: study describes, in a simplistic scheme, the mechanisms leading socio-cultural, he said, women in sexual frustration, which disrupts their hormonal production, this causes, end of stroke, breast cancer (but curiously not that of cervical or ovarian cancer). In fact, they are social conventions, rather than biological factors, which, again according to Mr. Stüger, trigger the disease. I quote: "In most Western societies, the economic independence of women has not improved to the point that their choice of a stable partner can be entirely based on their sexual attraction. If the selected partner n ' exerts little or no sexual attraction on the other spouse, it is likely that sexual frustration will eventually ensue, causing futures breast cancer in some women. ". Jerry Stüger then declined to explain his theory that a well-off women can not choose their partner in a small pool of men (one of their social caste), they are less likely to find one that suits them and sexually are more likely to get sick. Ditto for tall women. Obvious sexual frustration for the nuns. Same for women with a traditional, monogamous couple. Ditto for women of a certain age, who engage less in the pleasures of the flesh. According to this social pattern, the familial risk of breast cancer is not attributable to genetic predisposition, but the transmission from mother to daughter of a model couple, means of transmission of sexual frustration. On reading the article, we sometimes hesitate between bewilderment at the complete lack of scientific rigor and demonstration and laughter address these macho arguments worthy of the Café du Commerce. This article is only found in Google Scholar behalf of Jerry Stüger. The tool is not foolproof but it usually gives a good indication. Said Jerry Stüger is "doctorandus", which means it holds the equivalent of a Dutch master. It is not a medical doctor. It is unknown elsewhere in what discipline he studied. His name is followed by the initials CFA could mean that man has a degree .. Financial Analyst. Jerry Stüger is not part of any research organization, mailing address corresponds to an apartment in Amsterdam and his email address is a Yahoo account. As explained Neuroskeptic blog through which I discovered this article preposterous, The Breast Journal, without an extraordinary aura with an impact factor of 1.425 rather modest, is not a magazine bin. She is ranked 47th out of 75 publications on obstetrics and gynecology and 143 out of 184 journals in cancer, which means, writes the author of Neuroskeptic "there are 40 papers on cancer in the world who have less impact it. If I had published in this newspaper, I'd be a bit miffed that my work appears in the same pages. Fortunately, this is not the case but as a scientist, I still feel insulted by the fact that this has been published in a scientific journal and will appear on the shelves of libraries around the world under the headrest "Science." ". This is the very first step in the emergence of People are looking for answers and responses to breast cancer guess watch TV on comp d Yes. It s Tests on mice show that cycles of fasting during chemotherapy slows the development of certain cancers and prolong life. Short periods of fasting before and after chemotherapy may slow the development of breast cancer, melanoma and brain tumors. That's what a study conducted on. Human cancer cells and animals were administered by U.S. researchers in rodents subjected to three types of treatments. The former have received chemotherapy. The. Results: Melanoma metastases were found in 40% of mice that received chemotherapy, against only 20% among those who had fasted and 10% in mice. that combined the two treatments. "The combination of fasting with short cycles of chemotherapy is more effective, and possibly significantly more effective than chemotherapy alone," concludes. To explain the benefits of fasting, the study authors explain that to reduce the amount of food consumed slows tumor growth and spread of cancer. In 2008, researchers had already shown that the diet protects healthy cells from toxic effects of chemotherapy. Indeed, the drugs used to attack both cells. cancerous and normal cells, such as those responsible for hair growth. More recently, ten patients with cancer have experienced a fast as they. exceeding two days' can be harsh for patients already weakened by cancer. "

State: nNeuf without packaging: Brand new item sold without the package never worn original or a portion of packaging material as original post is missing the box or cover original post. Labels original post may not be attached. For example a pair of brand new shoes without the box should be inspected upon without original post falls into this category. Logically, Philippe Saint-Andre and his staff have made, to face Scotland Sunday, the same team that aligned to play against Ireland, ten days ago. Lice, Szarzewski, Maestri (first start), Harinordoquy and Parra will start well this meeting, including the coach fears the pace. After two days to homogenize the fitness level of players (some have played this weekend, some not, some other), to linking intense workouts with little recovery time because there, says Saint-Andre rightly, is the huge difference between Top 14 and international level (Recycling time from January to February), the XV de France will continue focusing on preparing a one against one and the ball skills to deprive of swells and Advanced Scots and their waltz. Hope that players have found, Sunday, the treasury of the World seems illusory. St. Andrew dream State: nOccasion: An object that has been raised. Consult the description of the seller for more details on any imperfections. I was born in Madrid and 9 years I made my debut in a RACE Rally of Spain on a stretch of forest between Pine and Cebreros Hole. How could it be otherwise, the German Grand Prix was overshadowed by another scandal. On the one hand, looks back against the FIA ​​and the absurdity of many of the points of regulation. On the other Ferrari rugby balls size 4 manifested clumsiness, caused by the rebellion of Massa, which led to stage a farce worthy of the best prizes in any corrala first class. F1 is a team sport. But the FIA, and its most common reactions to hot to put out fires, 8 years ago changed the rules forbidding team orders. Why?. In the A1-Ring, curiously neutered another circuit (Osterreichring) and Hockenheim, on the last lap was ordered Barrichello to let Michael Schumacher pass. The warnings that were given to the Brazilian were falling on deaf ears until Todt himself was threatened. The Brazilian was stopped before the finish line to let Schumacher and cement his lead, and importantly, in charge of the overall 2002 World Cup. Since then we have seen a thousand and one paripés between teammates to logically favor the interests of the team. Since the beginning of the world in the 50's it was common for a pilot give up her car to a friend by breaking it. Thus we have victories and podiums shared by two drivers. Nor was it strange in the 60's and 70's teams to enroll a car more than usual to try to block the classification to a rival. These paripés have orchestrated a more or less visible. There have been more or less disguised. Have been more or less impact. But the farce of yesterday's anthology. It is unfortunate that the work he has undertaken in recent years Ferrari has been marred by a rebel. Because the way it has worked in Maranello has been huge and beastly. Since they realized they had a good foundation and that they had to do was improve it and forget about inventions of others, have worked tirelessly day and night. And the fruit that we saw in Valencia, has culminated in Hockenheim they have come to the right height in qualifying and race have been swept. Felipe Massa has been unfair to his team. Felipe Massa has forgotten that he was a nobody and that Ferrari was allowed to grow. Even after a disastrous season with Sauber that, in normal and if your representative has not been the son of Jean Todt, he should have been taken out of F1. A Massa has forgotten the favors he did Raikkonen. And he made them because I had to forward them. But never saw a frown on the Finn when he lent a hand to fight for the title in 2008. Face itself was bad when dejópasar the Finn in 2007 at home to Kimi and Ferrari consiguieran the title. Massa went deep into many hearts, and the other scratched a little, after the terrible incident in Hungary last year. It did forget many of their behaviors. But do not forget that from the beginning torpedoed the arrival of Alonso with statements of bad taste. A lot of press, ready to shoot Alonso, he made the game referring to had almost given his life for Ferrari and was the favorite driver on the team in a shameful and tortuous manipulation. Unfortunately for him, mediocre but much improved rider, the track put each one in its place. And the differences with Alonso have touched, if not exceeded, the