Breast Cancer Guess Watch
February 22, 2012 Category :Uncategorized Off
The Susan G. Komen for the Cure Foundation has decided to withdraw its funding from Planned Parenthood this week, claiming the threshold was the result of the new family planning policy prohibiting grants to organizations covered by the Technical studies and unbiased statistical analyzes show that orthodox cancer treatments such as radical surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy n Although journals are forced to make withdrawals of articles following this kind of fraud, see their reputation tarnished, they can always argue their good faith. But there is worse: when a scientific journal with peer has obviously not done his job. It is probably this yellow line that has just passed The Breast Journal. Owned by the American Wiley-Blackwell, which publishes some 1,500 scientific publications, this review focuses on research into breast disease (primarily cancer) and their treatments. December 30, 2011, The Breast Journal published on its website, in its section "Short Communications", a 4 page article signed by a Dutchman named Jerry Stüger, which wants an essay on sexual frustration in women as main cause (and unknown) breast cancer. The thesis is very original, which claims to "explain why, despite all available data on risk factors for breast cancer, 75% of women with breast cancer have no risk factors". The author does not bother to specify how it got this number and provides no experimental data. Moreover, none of the 15 references found at the end of the article relates to breast cancer! They all concern sexuality because therein lies the main idea of Jerry Stüger: study describes, in a simplistic scheme, the mechanisms leading socio-cultural, he said, women in sexual frustration, which disrupts their hormonal production, this causes, end of stroke, breast cancer (but curiously not that of cervical or ovarian cancer). In fact, they are social conventions, rather than biological factors, which, again according to Mr. Stüger, trigger the disease. I quote: "In most Western societies, the economic independence of women has not improved to the point that their choice of a stable partner can be entirely based on their sexual attraction. If the selected partner n ' exerts little or no sexual attraction on the other spouse, it is likely that sexual frustration will eventually ensue, causing futures breast cancer in some women. ". Jerry Stüger then declined to explain his theory that a well-off women can not choose their partner in a small pool of men (one of their social caste), they are less likely to find one that suits them and sexually are more likely to get sick. Ditto for tall women. Obvious sexual frustration for the nuns. Same for women with a traditional, monogamous couple. Ditto for women of a certain age, who engage less in the pleasures of the flesh. According to this social pattern, the familial risk of breast cancer is not attributable to genetic predisposition, but the transmission from mother to daughter of a model couple, means of transmission of sexual frustration. On reading the article, we sometimes hesitate between bewilderment at the complete lack of scientific rigor and demonstration and laughter address these macho arguments worthy of the Café du Commerce. This article is only found in Google Scholar behalf of Jerry Stüger. The tool is not foolproof but it usually gives a good indication. Said Jerry Stüger is "doctorandus", which means it holds the equivalent of a Dutch master. It is not a medical doctor. It is unknown elsewhere in what discipline he studied. His name is followed by the initials CFA could mean that man has a degree .. Financial Analyst. Jerry Stüger is not part of any research organization, mailing address corresponds to an apartment in Amsterdam and his email address is a Yahoo account. As explained Neuroskeptic blog through which I discovered this article preposterous, The Breast Journal, without an extraordinary aura with an impact factor of 1.425 rather modest, is not a magazine bin. She is ranked 47th out of 75 publications on obstetrics and gynecology and 143 out of 184 journals in cancer, which means, writes the author of Neuroskeptic "there are 40 papers on cancer in the world who have less impact it. If I had published in this newspaper, I'd be a bit miffed that my work appears in the same pages. Fortunately, this is not the case but as a scientist, I still feel insulted by the fact that this has been published in a scientific journal and will appear on the shelves of libraries around the world under the headrest "Science." ". This is the very first step in the emergence of People are looking for answers and responses to breast cancer guess watch TV on comp d Yes. It s Tests on mice show that cycles of fasting during chemotherapy slows the development of certain cancers and prolong life. Short periods of fasting before and after chemotherapy may slow the development of breast cancer, melanoma and brain tumors. That's what a study conducted on. Human cancer cells and animals were administered by U.S. researchers in rodents subjected to three types of treatments. The former have received chemotherapy. The. Results: Melanoma metastases were found in 40% of mice that received chemotherapy, against only 20% among those who had fasted and 10% in mice. that combined the two treatments. "The combination of fasting with short cycles of chemotherapy is more effective, and possibly significantly more effective than chemotherapy alone," concludes. To explain the benefits of fasting, the study authors explain that to reduce the amount of food consumed slows tumor growth and spread of cancer. In 2008, researchers had already shown that the diet protects healthy cells from toxic effects of chemotherapy. Indeed, the drugs used to attack both cells. cancerous and normal cells, such as those responsible for hair growth. More recently, ten patients with cancer have experienced a fast as they. exceeding two days' can be harsh for patients already weakened by cancer. "